This site uses cookies for technical and analytics to ensure you get the best experience. Please click the button below to accept and close or read more information
Hertford 01992 306616
London 0207 956 2740

Law Articles

Please note: This article provides general information and may not reflect the most recent legal or procedural changes. Family law develops over time, so please contact us for up-to-date advice on your situation.

Family law reform: What change could mean for you and your family 30/01/2026

Family law in England and Wales is entering a period of long-awaited reflection. The government has confirmed that it will shortly consult on financial remedies on divorce, cohabitation rights and prenuptial agreements. For separating couples, and those planning their futures, this signals potential change to an area of law that affects people at some of the most emotionally and financially challenging moments of their lives.

At the centre of the debate lies a simple but critical question: should financial outcomes continue to depend so heavily on judicial discretion, or is it time for clearer, more predictable rules?

For families, the answer matters.

Financial remedies on divorce

Financial provision on divorce is still governed by the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. While this legislation has stood the test of time in some respects, it was drafted for a society that looks very different from today’s. In the early 1970s most families relied on a single income, women were far more likely to give up careers to care for children, and cohabitation without marriage was far less common.

Fast forward to today and family life is far more varied. Many couples share earnings and childcare responsibilities. Second marriages and blended families are common. Increasing numbers of people choose to live together without marrying at all. Yet when relationships end, the law still asks judges to apply broad and flexible statutory criteria, leaving a great deal to interpretation.

A pivotal moment came 25 years ago with the decision in White v White, a case that transformed the way courts approach financial division on divorce. The case involved a farming couple who had worked together throughout their long marriage. When they separated, the initial focus of the court was on the wife’s “reasonable needs”, an approach that often resulted in one party, usually the husband, retaining most of the assets. The House of Lords rejected that mindset. Instead, it made clear that marriage is a partnership, and that there should be no bias in favour of the money-earner over the homemaker or child-carer. Equality, the court said, should be the starting point.

This principle reshaped family law practice almost overnight.

For many, this highlighted both the strength and the weakness of the legal system. It allowed for flexibility to reflect individual circumstances, but there was unpredictability in outcomes.

Since White v White, family law has continued to evolve, but almost entirely through judge-made law rather than statutory reform. Notable developments include greater recognition of non-financial contributions, more nuanced approaches to inherited and pre-marital wealth, and the introduction of no-fault divorce in 2022.

However, the statutory framework underpinning financial remedies remains largely unchanged. This means that two cases with very similar facts can still produce very different outcomes. This makes early legal advice essential when considering separation or divorce.

Prenuptial agreements

Prenuptial agreements are now common, particularly where one or both partners have pre-existing wealth, there are children from previous relationships, and family businesses or inheritances are involved. Their status in English law, however, remains unusual.

In Radmacher v Granatino, the Supreme Court ruled that prenups should generally be upheld if they are entered into freely, with full disclosure, and without unfairness. While this was a major step forward, prenups are still not automatically legally binding. Despite recommendations from the Law Commission and a draft bill, Parliament has never legislated in this area. A well-drafted prenuptial agreement can carry significant weight, but how it is prepared matters just as much as what it says. Independent legal advice and proper timing are crucial.

Why reform is back on the table?

Pressure for reform has been building for years. Critics of the current system argue that wide judicial discretion creates uncertainty, legal costs are higher for those who can afford to litigate, litigants in person struggle to understand likely outcomes, and the law does not adequately reflect modern family life. Supporters of reform want clearer rules to help couples resolve matters earlier, with less conflict and fewer costs.

Proposals under discussion include a clearer presumption of equal division of matrimonial assets, time-limited spousal maintenance rather than open-ended payments, greater recognition and protection for cohabiting couples, and fully binding prenuptial agreements. The Law Commission has described the current framework as lacking clarity and accessibility, particularly for those without legal representation.

What could change mean for you?

While no final decisions have yet been made, reform could have real and practical consequences.

For couples considering separation or divorce  

• Greater predictability could make settlement easier
• Earlier resolution may reduce emotional strain and legal costs
• Clearer rules could limit drawn-out disputes

For those living together but not married

• Potential new rights on separation
• Greater clarity around financial responsibility
• Less reliance on complex trust and property arguments

For those planning marriage

• Increased certainty around prenuptial agreements
• Better tools to protect family wealth and businesses
• Clearer expectations from the outset

Looking ahead

One of the central challenges of reform will be striking the right balance. Rigid rules can offer certainty, but risk unfairness in exceptional cases. Flexibility allows judges to respond to individual circumstances but can create unpredictability. The upcoming consultation will need to address how best to combine fair outcomes, predictable expectations, reduced conflict, and accessibility for families without extensive resources.

For decades, family law has relied on judges to modernise outdated legislation case by case. That approach has delivered important progress, but it has also left many families navigating uncertainty at already difficult times. The government’s forthcoming consultation represents a real opportunity to reshape the landscape of family justice.

For further information and advice on this issue, and other family law issues, please contact us for a free initial consultation.

Back to Law Articles
Resolution
Manor Law Ltd, trading as Manor Law Family Solicitors, is a registered company in England and Wales - number 07977350, and is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority - Hertford office SRA number 567506 and City of London office SRA number 568637. Copyright © Manor Law, 2026. All rights reserved.
×

Request Call Back

Thank you! Your callback request was sent successfully and we will contact you shortly.

×